

Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.) Filing date Publication date Application filed by Leonard Hurst, Carl Bergman, Russell Turner filed Critical Leonard Hurst Priority to US445855A priority Critical patent/US2793487A/en Application granted granted Critical Publication of US2793487A publication Critical patent/US2793487A/en Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical Status Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current Links Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.) Expired - Lifetime Application number US445855A Inventor Theodore H Wobermin Original Assignee Leonard Hurst Carl Bergman Russell Turner Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion.
#Chain sickle capture gif pdf
The ability to use one of two damage types and the added versatile property are nice properties but dropping the finesse property while keeping a d4 damage die is underwhelming.- Google Patents US2793487A - Chain sickle mowerĭownload PDF Info Publication number US2793487A US2793487A US445855A US44585554A US2793487A US 2793487 A US2793487 A US 2793487A US 445855 A US445855 A US 445855A US 44585554 A US44585554 A US 44585554A US 2793487 A US2793487 A US 2793487A Authority US United States Prior art keywords sickle chain mower plate frame Prior art date Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Comparatively, the whip deals the same damage in one hand, but has the finesse property. Besides that, I am unsure whether this weapon deals too little damage. You add the ability to use this variant rule on a reach weapon, and it exacerbates the issue. This is an issue as detailed on my earlier comments on it, as the entangle property is likely unbalanced to add to a weapon. To start with, this weapon has the Entangle variant rule. In the end it might be, but I believe this weapon has too many uncertainties for me to support it.

Secondly, now you can use it with two-weapon fighting if you take the dual wielder feat. I have made it versatile rather than heavy. If we could try work around that, if these changes i have just made arnt suitable, that would be much appreciated. i am determined to have this weapon able to be dual-wielded, that is the only thing i dont wanna change. I have made more changes, taking in the advice from Marasmusine. But I'm beginning to think that any reach weapon should be martial.
